![]() ![]() Kuhn TS (1970a) Logic of discovery or psychology of research? In: Lakatos I, Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions, 1st edn. ![]() University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp 410–505 In: Kitcher P, Salmon WC (eds) Scientific explanation. Kitcher P (1989) Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. Kitcher P (1984) 1953 and all that: a tale of two sciences. Longman, Hurts, Rees, Orme, and Brown, London Johnson S (1755) Dictionary of the English language. Hall AR (1954) The Scientific Revolution 1500–1800. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 31–48 In: Gavroglu K, Christianidis J, Nicolaidis E (eds) Trends in the historiography of science. Hacking I (1994) Styles of scientific thinking or reasoning: a new analytic tool for historians and philosophers of the sciences. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London Giere RN (2006) Scientific Perspectivism. Benno Schwabe & Co., Baselįlorio J (1611) Queen Anna’s New World of words, or, Dictionarie of the Italian and English tongues. Librairie Victor Masson, Parisįleck L (1935) Entstehung Und Entwicklung Einer Wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in Die Lehre Vom Denkstil Und Denkkollektiv. MacFarquharĮnfantin P, Saint-Simon H (1858) Science de l’homme, Physiologie Religieuse. Schleicher Frères, Parisĭiderot D (1754) Pensées Sur l’interpretation de La NatureĮncyclopaedia Britannica (1771) Vol 3. Comptes Rendus de I’Academie Des Sciences (Paris) 130:845–847ĭelage Y (1903) L’hérédité et Les Grands Problèmes de La Biologie Générale, 2nd edn. Berichte Der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 18(3):83–90ĭe Vries H (1900b) Sur La Loi de Disjonction Des Hybrides. Gustav Fischer, Jeanĭe Vries H (1900a) Das Spaltungsgesetz Der Bastarde (Vorlaufige Mittheilung). Philos Sci 44(1):43–64ĭe Vries H (1889) Intracellulare Pangenesis. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 33(1):1–28ĭarden L, Maull N (1977) Interfield theories. Iss.):349–371ĭarden L, Craver CF (2002) Strategies in the Interfield discovery of the mechanism of protein synthesis. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci Stud Hist Phi Part C 36(2 Spec. Oxford University Press, Oxfordĭarden L (2005) Relations among Fields: Mendelian, Cytological and Molecular Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridgeĭarden L (1991) Theory change in science: strategies from Mendelian genetics. Gerald Duckworth & Company, Londonĭampier WC (1929) A history of science. Berichte Der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 18(4):158–168Ĭrombie AC (1994) Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. Mendels Regel Über Das Verhalten Der Nachkommenschaft Der Rassenbastarde. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAĬorrens C (1900) G. Suite Des Memoires de Mathematique, et Dephysique, Tires Des Registres de l’Academie Royale Des Sciences de l’annee 2:465Ĭohen IB (1985) Revolution in science. Routledge, New York/London, pp 67–79Ĭlairaut A-C (1754) Du Systeme Du Monde, Dans Les Principes de La Gravitation Universelle. In: Soler L, Zwart S, Lynch M, Israel-Jost V (eds) Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history and social studies of science. Springer, DordrechtĬhang H (2014) Epistemic activities and Systems of Practice: units of analysis in philosophy of science after the practical turn. Bell & Sons, LondonĬawdrey R (1604) A table alphabeticall, LondonĬhang H (2012) Is water H2O? Evidence, realism and pluralism. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., Londonīutterfield H (1949) The Origins of Modern Science 1300–1800. The Athlone Press, Londonīurtt EA (1925) The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridgeīowler PJ (1989) The Mendelian revolution: the emergence of Hereditarian concepts in modern science and society. The relationship between reflection lines and highlight lines is likened to that between specular and diffuse shading.Bateson W (1902) Mendel’s principles of heredity: a Defence. Reflection lines visualized on surfaces completed using a biharmonic and triharmonic equation with C 1 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |